.svg)
.png)
The Cyber Assessment Framework 4.0 is a structured approach developed in the United Kingdom to help organisations understand, assess and improve their management of cyber security risk.
The framework is designed to be applicable across sectors and sizes, with particular relevance for affected organisations that provide essential or important services. Its purpose is not to prescribe specific technologies or controls but to provide a clear, outcomes focused method for evaluating whether cyber risks are being managed effectively and proportionately.
The Cyber Assessment Framework, commonly referred to as the CAF, reflects a maturity based view of cyber security. It recognises that effective cyber resilience is achieved through governance, people, processes and technology working together. Version 4.0 builds on earlier iterations by clarifying expectations, aligning more closely with international standards and improving usability for both technical and non-technical audiences.
Purpose and design principles
The Cyber Assessment Framework 4.0 is built around a small set of design principles that guide how organisations should approach cyber security. These principles shape both how the framework is structured and how it is meant to be applied in practice.
Outcome focused structure
The Cyber Assessment Framework 4.0 judges cyber security by outcomes rather than by the mere presence of controls. Each part of the framework defines what good cyber security looks like in practice, allowing affected organisations to assess whether they are achieving those outcomes in a way that suits their context.
This design avoids a checklist mentality. Instead of asking whether a specific tool has been deployed, the CAF asks whether:
- risks are understood
- risks are managed
- risks are reduced to acceptable levels.
This makes the framework adaptable to different operating environments, threat landscapes and organisational capabilities.
Proportionality and flexibility
Proportionality is a central concept within the CAF. The framework recognises that cyber risk varies based on factors such as:
- the nature of the services provided
- the sensitivity of the data handled
- the potential impact of disruption
As a result, organisations are expected to apply controls and processes that are proportionate to their actual risk exposure.
Flexibility is achieved by avoiding prescriptive technical requirements. Organisations are encouraged to select solutions that meet their needs while still achieving the defined outcomes. This supports innovation and continuous improvement rather than compliance driven behaviour.
The structure of the framework
The Cyber Assessment Framework is organised to give organisations a clear, top level view of what cyber resilience requires, while still supporting detailed assessment in practice.
Objectives and principles
The CAF is organised around four high level objectives that represent the essential aspects of cyber resilience. These objectives cover:
- governance
- protection
- detection
- response
Each objective is supported by a set of principles that describe the key elements required to achieve it.
The objectives provide a clear narrative that is easy to communicate at executive level. They help senior leaders understand how cyber security supports organisational resilience and service continuity.
The principles translate this narrative into more specific expectations that can be assessed in practice.
Indicators of good practice
Under each principle, the framework defines indicators of good practice. These indicators describe behaviours, capabilities and arrangements that demonstrate effective risk management. They are intentionally written in accessible language to support consistent interpretation.
Indicators of good practice are not binary pass or fail measures. Instead, they support informed judgement about whether an organisation is meeting the intent of the framework. This allows assessors and organisations to consider evidence in context and recognise partial or evolving implementation.
Governance and risk management
The Cyber Assessment Framework places governance and risk management at the centre of effective cyber resilience, with clear expectations for leadership involvement and informed decision making.
Leadership and accountability
One of the key messages of the Cyber Assessment Framework 4.0 is that cyber security is a leadership issue. Effective governance requires clear accountability at senior levels and active oversight of cyber risks as part of wider organisational risk management.
The framework expects organisations to define roles and responsibilities for cyber security. Senior decision makers should:
- understand the potential impact of cyber incidents
- set and review cyber risk appetite
- ensure appropriate resources are allocated
- integrate cyber considerations into strategic planning
Risk based decision making
Risk management within the CAF is focused on understanding what needs to be protected and why. Organisations are expected to identify critical services, supporting assets and dependencies. This understanding forms the basis for prioritising security efforts and investments.
Rather than eliminating all risk, the framework promotes informed risk acceptance. Leaders should be able to explain which risks are tolerated, which are mitigated and how decisions are reviewed over time. This supports transparency and accountability.
Protecting systems and data
The protection objective of the Cyber Assessment Framework focuses on reducing the likelihood and impact of cyber incidents through effective preventive controls.
Secure design and configuration
The CAF emphasises the importance of secure design and configuration. Organisations are expected to build security into systems from the outset rather than relying on reactive controls.
This includes managing access, ensuring systems are configured securely and maintaining up to date knowledge of assets. The framework highlights the need for consistency and discipline in applying protective measures across the organisation.
Managing people and supply chains
People are a critical component of cyber resilience. The CAF addresses the need for:
- appropriate training and awareness
- cultural support for secure behaviours
- clear reporting paths for issues and concerns
Staff should understand their role in protecting the organisation and feel empowered to act.
Supply chain security is also a key consideration. Organisations are expected to understand and manage the cyber risks arising from third parties. This includes setting expectations, monitoring performance and responding to issues that could affect service delivery.
Detecting cyber security events
The detection objective of the Cyber Assessment Framework focuses on identifying suspicious activity and potential incidents early enough to limit impact.
Monitoring and logging
Detection within the Cyber Assessment Framework 4.0 relies on the ability to identify anomalous activity in a timely manner. Effective monitoring and logging are essential to achieving this.
The framework does not mandate specific tools. Instead, it expects organisations to:
- maintain visibility over systems and networks
- collect and retain relevant logs
- align detection capabilities with risk and service criticality
Analysis and escalation
Detection is only effective if it leads to appropriate action. The CAF therefore emphasises the importance of analysing alerts and escalating issues when necessary. Clear processes should exist to ensure that potential incidents are investigated and understood.
This capability supports both rapid response and longer term improvement by providing insight into attack patterns and weaknesses.
Responding to and recovering from incidents
Organisations are expected to have documented and tested incident response plans that reflect realistic scenarios.
Incident response planning
Organisations are expected to have documented and tested incident response plans that reflect realistic scenarios.
Plans should define roles, communication channels and decision making processes. Regular exercises help ensure that plans remain effective and that staff are familiar with their responsibilities during an incident.
Recovery and learning
Recovery focuses on restoring services and learning from experience. The framework highlights the need for organisations to understand recovery priorities and dependencies. This supports timely and coordinated restoration of critical services.
Learning from incidents is equally important. Post incident reviews should identify lessons and drive improvements to controls, processes and training. This reinforces a cycle of continuous improvement.
Assessment and continuous improvement
The Cyber Assessment Framework is designed to support ongoing evaluation and improvement, rather than a one off compliance exercise.
Using the CAF for self assessment
The Cyber Assessment Framework 4.0 supports both self assessment and independent review. Affected organisations can use the framework to understand their current position and identify areas for improvement.
Self assessment encourages ownership and engagement across the organisation. It provides a common language for discussing cyber security and aligning technical and business perspectives.
Driving maturity over time
The CAF supports a maturity based approach rather than a one time assessment. Organisations are encouraged to review their performance regularly and to track progress against the framework outcomes.
This approach recognises that threats evolve and that cyber resilience must be maintained over time. Continuous improvement is achieved by embedding the CAF into governance, planning and assurance activities.
Conclusion
The Cyber Assessment Framework 4.0 provides a clear, practical way for organisations to understand and improve how they manage cyber security risk. Its outcome focused and proportionate design makes it suitable across different contexts while maintaining a strong emphasis on resilience and accountability.
By structuring cyber security around governance, protection, detection and response, the CAF helps leaders understand how security activities support wider organisational objectives. Used well, it supports informed decision making and sustained improvement over time.
