Article 41: Format and content of the report on the review of the simplified ICT risk management framework

Oh no! No description found. But not to worry. Read from Tasks below how to advance this topic.

1. The financial entities referred to in Article 16(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 shall submit the report on the review of the ICT risk management framework referred to in paragraph 2 of that Article in a searchable electronic format.

2. The report referred to in paragraph 1 shall contain all of the following information:

(a) an introductory section providing:

(i) a description of the context of the report in terms of the nature, scale, and complexity of the financial entity’s services, activities, and operations, the financial entity’s organisation, identified critical functions, strategy, major ongoing projects or activities, and relationships, and the financial entity’s dependence on in-house and outsourced ICT services and systems, or the implications that a total loss or severe degradation of such systems would have on critical or important functions and market efficiency;

(ii) an executive level summary of the current and near-term ICT risk identified, threat landscape, the assessed effectiveness of its controls, and the security posture of the financial entity;

(iii) information about the reported area;

(iv) a summary of the major changes in the ICT risk management framework since the previous report;

(v) a summary and a description of the impact of major changes to the simplified ICT risk management framework since the previous report;

(b) where applicable, the date of the approval of the report by the management body of the financial entity;

(c) a description of the reasons for the review, including:

(i) where the review has been initiated following supervisory instructions, evidence of such instructions;

(ii) where the review has been initiated following the occurrence of ICT-related incidents, the list of all those ICT-related incidents with related incident root-cause analysis;

(d) the start and end date of the review period;

(e) the person responsible for the review;

(f) a summary of findings, and a self-assessment of the severity of the weaknesses, deficiencies, and gaps identified in ICT risk management framework for the review period, including a detailed analysis thereof;

(g) remedying measures identified to address weaknesses, deficiencies, and gaps in the simplified ICT risk management framework, and the expected date for implementing those measures, including the follow-up on weaknesses, deficiencies, and gaps identified in previous reports, where those weaknesses, deficiencies, and gaps have not yet been remedied;

(h) overall conclusions on the review of the simplified ICT risk management framework, including any further planned developments.

This requirement is part of the framework:  
DORA simplified RMF

Other requirements of the framework

34733
Article 41: Format and content of the report on the review of the simplified ICT risk management framework
No items found.
Best practices
How to implement:
Article 41: Format and content of the report on the review of the simplified ICT risk management framework
This policy on
Article 41: Format and content of the report on the review of the simplified ICT risk management framework
provides a set concrete tasks you can complete to secure this topic. Follow these best practices to ensure compliance and strengthen your overall security posture.

1. The financial entities referred to in Article 16(1) of Regulation (EU) 2022/2554 shall submit the report on the review of the ICT risk management framework referred to in paragraph 2 of that Article in a searchable electronic format.

2. The report referred to in paragraph 1 shall contain all of the following information:

(a) an introductory section providing:

(i) a description of the context of the report in terms of the nature, scale, and complexity of the financial entity’s services, activities, and operations, the financial entity’s organisation, identified critical functions, strategy, major ongoing projects or activities, and relationships, and the financial entity’s dependence on in-house and outsourced ICT services and systems, or the implications that a total loss or severe degradation of such systems would have on critical or important functions and market efficiency;

(ii) an executive level summary of the current and near-term ICT risk identified, threat landscape, the assessed effectiveness of its controls, and the security posture of the financial entity;

(iii) information about the reported area;

(iv) a summary of the major changes in the ICT risk management framework since the previous report;

(v) a summary and a description of the impact of major changes to the simplified ICT risk management framework since the previous report;

(b) where applicable, the date of the approval of the report by the management body of the financial entity;

(c) a description of the reasons for the review, including:

(i) where the review has been initiated following supervisory instructions, evidence of such instructions;

(ii) where the review has been initiated following the occurrence of ICT-related incidents, the list of all those ICT-related incidents with related incident root-cause analysis;

(d) the start and end date of the review period;

(e) the person responsible for the review;

(f) a summary of findings, and a self-assessment of the severity of the weaknesses, deficiencies, and gaps identified in ICT risk management framework for the review period, including a detailed analysis thereof;

(g) remedying measures identified to address weaknesses, deficiencies, and gaps in the simplified ICT risk management framework, and the expected date for implementing those measures, including the follow-up on weaknesses, deficiencies, and gaps identified in previous reports, where those weaknesses, deficiencies, and gaps have not yet been remedied;

(h) overall conclusions on the review of the simplified ICT risk management framework, including any further planned developments.

Read below what concrete actions you can take to improve this ->
Frameworks that include requirements for this topic:
No items found.

How to improve security around this topic

In Cyberday, requirements and controls are mapped to universal tasks. A set of tasks in the same topic create a Policy, such as this one.

Here's a list of tasks that help you improve your information and cyber security related to
Article 41: Format and content of the report on the review of the simplified ICT risk management framework
Task name
Priority
Task completes
Complete these tasks to increase your compliance in this policy.
Critical
No other tasks found.

How to comply with this requirement

In Cyberday, requirements and controls are mapped to universal tasks. Each requirement is fulfilled with one or multiple tasks.

Here's a list of tasks that help you comply with the requirement
Article 41: Format and content of the report on the review of the simplified ICT risk management framework
of the framework  
DORA simplified RMF
Task name
Priority
Task completes
Complete these tasks to increase your compliance in this policy.
Critical
Review reporting of simplified ICT risk management framework
Critical
High
Normal
Low
1
requirements
Risk management and leadership
Cyber security management

Review reporting of simplified ICT risk management framework

This task helps you comply with the following requirements

The ISMS component hierachy

When building an ISMS, it's important to understand the different levels of information hierarchy. Here's how Cyberday is structured.

Framework

Sets the overall compliance standard or regulation your organization needs to follow.

Requirements

Break down the framework into specific obligations that must be met.

Tasks

Concrete actions and activities your team carries out to satisfy each requirement.

Policies

Documented rules and practices that are created and maintained as a result of completing tasks.

Never duplicate effort. Do it once - improve compliance across frameworks.

Reach multi-framework compliance in the simplest possible way
Security frameworks tend to share the same core requirements - like risk management, backup, malware, personnel awareness or access management.
Cyberday maps all frameworks’ requirements into shared tasks - one single plan that improves all frameworks’ compliance.
Do it once - we automatically apply it to all current and future frameworks.